tradewarmongering

Out of Gaps In Treaties, First Salvos Of Trade War:

In 1930, Congress fired the first shot in a protectionist battle that prolonged and deepened the Great Depression. After passing a bill aimed at saving American jobs by effectively barring 20,000 imported goods, including French dresses and Argentine butter, other nations retaliated by raising their own barriers on U.S. products, effectively bringing global commerce to a halt.

[Now] In the United States, a move to greatly expand Buy American provisions as part of the $819 billion fiscal stimulus package has generated shock waves in other countries, with Canadian and European officials in particular rising up in protest. The provision, passed by the House on Wednesday, would mostly bar foreign steel and iron from the infrastructure projects laid out in the stimulus package. A Senate version still being considered goes further, requiring, with few exceptions, that all stimulus-funded projects use only American-made equipment and goods.

Now more than never Hazlitt is meaningful:

The effect of a tariff, therefore, is to change the structure of American production. It changes the number of occupations, the kind of occupations, and the relative size of one industry as compared with another. It makes the industries in which we are comparatively inefficient larger, and the industries in which we are comparatively efficient smaller. Its net effect, therefore, is to reduce American efficiency, as well as to reduce efficiency in the countries with which we would otherwise have traded more largely.

Henry Hazlitt in 1946 over the current crisis

Government-guaranteed home mortgages, especially when a negligible down payment or no down payment whatever is required, inevitably mean more bad loans than otherwise. They force the general taxpayer to subsidize the bad risks and to defray the losses. They encourage people to "buy" houses that they cannot really afford. They tend eventually to bring about a oversupply of houses as compared with other things. They temporarily overstimulate building, raise the cost of building for everyone (including the buyers of the homes with the guaranteed mortgages), and may mislead the building industry into an eventually costly overexpansion. In brief, in the long run they do not increase overall national production but encourage malinvestment.

Henry Hazlitt, Economics in One Lesson

constant lying

This is what 'monetary management' really amounts to. In practice it's merely a high-sounding euphemism for continuous currency debasement. It consists in constant lying in order to support constant swindling. Instead of automatic currencies based on gold, people are forced to take 'managed' currencies based on guile. Instead of precious metal they hold paper promises whose value falls for every bureaucratic win. And they are suavely asured that only antiquated minds dream of returning to truth, and honesty, and solvency, in gold.

Henry hazlitt

So Now Saving Is Bad

"So Now Saving Is Bad" by Sheldon Richman:

Keynes is back! Unfortunately. If you want to make sense of most of the reporting and commentary on the econony these days, you have to realize that most reporters and commentators and politicians are working from the Keynesian position that, as Paul Krugman puts it, “[I]ndividual virtue can be public vice… attempts by consumers to do the right thing by saving more can leave everyone worse off.” This is Keynes’s so-called “Paradox of Thrift.”

From Economics in One Lesson from Henry Hazlitt:

The enemies of saving are not through. They begin by drawing a distinction, which is proper enough, between "savings" and "investment." But then they start to talk as if the two were independent variables and as if it were merely an accident that they should ever equal each other. These writers paint a portentous picture. On the one side are savers automatically, pointlessly, stupidly continuing to save; on the other side are limited "investment opportunities" that cannot absorb this saving. The result, alas, is stagnation. The only solution, they declare, is for the government to expropriate these stupid and harmful savings and to invent its own projects, even if these are only useless ditches or pyramids, to use up the money and provide employment.

Good reading: Visions and Frameworks in Macroeconomics

What You Should Know About Inflation

"What You Should Know About Inflation" by Henry Hazlitt:

Inflation, to sum up, is the increase in the volume of money and bank credit in relation to the volume of goods. It is harmful because it depreciates the value of the monetary unit, raises everybody's cost of living, imposes what is in effect a tax on the poorest (without exemptions) at as high a rate as the tax on the richest, wipes out the value of past savings, discourages future savings, redistributes wealth and income wantonly, encourages and rewards speculation and gambling at the expense of thrift and work, undermines confidence in the justice of a free enterprise system, and corrupts public and private morals.

Inflation, always and everywhere, is primarily caused by an increase in the supply of money and credit. In fact, inflation is the increase in the supply of money and credit.

.... inflation must always end in a crisis and a slump, and that worse than the slump itself may be the public delusion that the slump has been caused, not by the previous inflation, but by the inherent defects of "capitalism."